Six years ago, I thought that my 10-year-old son was
becoming a video game addict so I hid his Nintendo DS. He came home from school
and hunted tirelessly for his most
cherished device, but to his dismay, he could not find it. Then, instead of
asking me about his console, he turned the computer on and googled: ‘How to
find a lost Nintendo DS?’ His move made me laugh, as I thought to myself
amused, “Oh my God! Look at this 21st century kid! His ultimate
source of information is the Internet!”
My son’s case was not a one-off; he represents the digital
generation. The digital revolution emerged in the 1980s, and gained pace in the
1990s due to the rising popularity of the Internet and the use of hypermedia.
Marc Prensky, a literacy expert, calls today’s children “digital natives.”
According to him, children of contemporary society are “native speakers” of the
digital language of computers, video games and the Internet. On one hand, it is
true that surviving in today’s world is impossible without knowing the digital
language. But on the other hand, a big question is, “How much exposure is
appropriate at a certain stage?” In my son’s case, I had to ask myself how much
exposure to the digital language was appropriate for a primary school student.
My 2012 PhD research was related to the perspectives of the newly
arrived English as a Second Language parents compared to those of primary
school teachers in Australia. During my research, one question I asked the
participating parents was about how they consider the use of digital devices by
their children from the point of view of learning. All of them unanimously agreed
that they were extremely worried about their children’s excessive exposure to
technology. They agreed that a ‘certain level’ of exposure was fine; but it was
hard for them to set limits on their kids’ digital activities. They were not
sure if the use (or misuse?) of the Internet was fostering or hampering their
children’s learning.
The Internet, along with digital devices, has definitely
benefited society. At the same time, they have their disadvantages. For
example, it seems that children have forgotten to read print materials, to play
outdoor games - they have even forgotten how to use their brains. Google seems
to be the solution to all problems. ‘Copy and paste’ has given birth to a new
generation of plagiarisers. Even though a lot of the information online is
useful, much of it seems to be unreliable.
Another problem that is prevalent due to the widespread use
of the Internet is children being exposed to the massive collection of
pornography. A research study conducted by Michele L. Ybarra and Kimberly J.
Mitchell in the US indicates that up to 90% or more youths between 12 and 18
years have access to the Internet. And a vast majority of the children, 87
percent, that look for sexual images online are 14 years or older. Such
inappropriate sexual materials can adversely affect children’s emotional and
sexual development.
These days it is impossible to imagine a classroom, especially
in Western countries to be without computers as a teaching/learning aide. In
the case of Nepal, although all classrooms may not be equipped with computers,
almost all children that attend schools in urban areas have easy access to them
either at school or at home. So, it was interesting to read in the article, ‘Computers
ok? Not in Silicon Valley’ that the Waldorf Schools - founded worldwide
following the humanistic teaching approach based on the educational philosophy
of the Austrian philosopher Rudolf Steiner - do not allow the use of technology
in classrooms. Students are not only discouraged from using computers at home,
but at school as well. Surprisingly, many employees of Silicon Valley giants
like Google, Apple, Yahoo and Hewlett-Packard, along with the chief technology
officer of eBay, have sent their children to a Waldorf Primary School in Los
Altos, California. The Waldorf parents argue that teaching-learning comes from
great teachers with interesting lesson plans, not from computers or video
games.
The war between technology advocates and traditionalists
rages on - and that is going to be the case for a while yet. Sure, prudent and
limited use of modern innovations such as the Internet and computers can lead
to a better informed society that is fluent in the digital language. But it is
just as easy for people to become hopelessly inebriated due to uncontrolled
exposure. Being a part of the digital age can be a blessing or a curse - it is
up to you to decide what it is going to be for you and your children.
(Published in an English Daily The Kathmandu Post on Sunday, July 26, 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would appreciate any and all suggestions on making improvements (as long as they are viable).